Det blev inte som det skulle - En kritisk diskursanalys av funktionshinder i personkretsbedömningar enligt 1 § 3 LSS
The purpose of this study was to investigate the discourses regarding disability in eligibility group 1 § 3 LSS in rulings by the Supreme Administrative Court. A critical discourse analysis according to Norman Fairclough’s model was used. The study found that there were three overarching discourses which were: disability as a bodily problem; disability as an expert assessment; and disability as an